   |
Intergenerational
attitudes to environmental change
While Historical Coastlines (community perspectives) will make available to the
public biophysical baseline data in the form of historical images and manuscript
material, it also hopes to draw some preliminary conclusions about intergenerational
attitudes to environmental change in the region. While there are any number of
studies that attempt this on the broad societal scale, few exist to guide the
task at a local level. To make best use of modest resources a methodology has
been devised which focuses on the engineering of natural systems and features.
Civil engineering projects probably are the most obvious examples of humanity’s
self-conscious attempts to exert control over nature on a large, and therefore
noticeable scale. |
|
As Taylor explains in a
recent paper proposing a repositioning of engineering practice, ‘If one
considers the great artefacts that are the defining symbols of engineering, they
typically represent the control and domination of environment, and exude a sense
of being able to rise above any earthly hold’. [Taylor:2002:11] While the
infrastructure projects being considered here might not be numbered among the
‘great artefacts’ of engineering, they do represent attempts to control
nature, and like most were largely undertaken to improve commerce and communication.
While ‘Sculpting the
Capricorn Coast’ might reveal ad hocery and policy amnesia with respect
to development, historical lessons of this sort are not its primary object. The
idea is to decipher the intergenerational discourse of local environmental management
rather than to inflict the condescension of history on old-time residents.
|
|